On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 10:24 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
The only reason I'm posting on the dev list is because there is no tag
on fdo.
The only reason I'm testing the nightly builds is because I was under
the impression that it was needed so that the devs get feedback as
quickly as possible.
Sure, but the crucial bit for dailies to prove their worth is
a) it worked on Monday's daily
b) it failed on Tuesday's daily
and you were comparing to 3.4.X so its unclear if the regression was
actually fresh in the daily you tested, or in some one earlier. The
ideal scenario is that you can zoom back to the earliest daily available
and test that and its ok, then bisect the dates and take a daily half
way from success to failure, test that one and so on to binary search
down to the day where it went wrong, at which point inspecting the
commit logs manually, or dev-level bisecting, finds the evil-doer.
if the issue of "no tag" is no version option to select in bugzilla,
then leave it "unspecified"
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.