On Jun 5, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
Hey, chill. As Sam says, there's no ideology involved, just choices. The last thing I want is an
ideological debate because I already know how it turns out. That's why I think it would be far
better not to keep making proposals whose most likely response is an explanation of how licensing
is the issue blocking them.
I'm chilling like a villain.
Sorry, but you *based* your conclusion of the inevitability of there being
2 projects on the *ideology* of copyleft vs non-copyleft.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.