Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:59, Rafael Dominguez <venccsralph@gmail.com> wrote:

Well im no legal expert, but from what i understand of the LGPL/MPL
licenses, they still are copyleft licenses, you can merge apache code and
libreoffice code, make your own version if you want, sell it etc, but if you
make any derivative work, you need to make those changes available to the
rest, so i dont think its possible to make a closed source office suite with
libreoffice code under LGPL/MPL.

A third party could do the following:

1. Core [from Apache], licensed under ALv2.
2. Features [from LO], licensed under MPL (you offer a choice, they pick MPL)
3. Proprietary "stuff"

This package can then be sold. If they make modifications to the LO
work, then they must release those changes. The third party is not
obligated to release any changes to the Apache code, nor their
proprietary code.

Note that the LGPL operates similarly. A third party could take LO
"Core" licensed under the LGPL and make releases, alongside
proprietary code. They would need to release changes to the core, but
it would still be possible *today*. The relink requirements under the
LGPL get a bit annoying, but would still be possible.

Cheers,
-g

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.