On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:37 +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
Argh ! I had just missed this operator. I should have waited for the
next day before sending this mail :-)
Heh :-)
Or did I miss something ? presumably another cppcheck false-positive
that needs filing& fixing (?).
For the moment, it's hard to talk about false positive for cppcheck
since we should use it by referencing all the include files. (I don't
know how to do it quickly). Caolan had talked about it (i don't
remember when precisely).
Oh - fun; hmm ... I wonder - could we not do it by substituting
cppcheck for the compiler, and pre-processing the whole file first - so
it was entirely self-contained ?
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.