Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 19/04/11 17:21, Lubos Lunak wrote:
+1 for disabling the backtrace

and yeah, the whole assert thing is pretty bogus but at least lets keep the information from those asserts ( converted into some warning or something ) 'cause at least I have gotten some hints to real brokeness in the past by those, if only I could remember which ones perhaps those would really be candidates for a proper aborting assert. Personally I'd like to see real asserts that bring the application to it's knees when a problem has occurred. Identifying the 'real' candidates for a proper assert from those that are actually warnings I think will be 'challenging' :-)


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.