Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Yifan Jiang píše v St 13. 04. 2011 v 17:29 +0800:
Collect the results on the wiki may be more easier for every body to 
participate.

It might be enough to show them in Litmus if they are well visible
there.

It looks a report page for a specific run can be generated as:

https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/test_run_report.cgi?test_run_id=3

Clicking the last column with non-zero inside would show the detailed
result.

Is it good enough for sharing info between QA team and release team?

The page looks fine. Well, there might be some problems:

     + the sample test cases are described in German; some people need
       not understand what the failed tests were about; it might get
       even more complicated i there are tests for other localizations

     + I am not sure how to distinguish how serious an error is; if it
       is a known bug or a regression in a core functionality

     + I am not sure how many test cases and test runs we would have.
       If we have too many, it might be quite complicated to do the
       Go/No-go decision by analyzing all the pages/numbers. In this
       case, we need to find a better way how QA people would inform
       about blockers, most annoying bugs.

Best Regards,
Petr


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.