Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
I'm attaching a patch that tries to implement this.

I've tested with our (Frugalware) junit jar where the classpath is in
manifest and also with upstream junit jar, which bundles hamcrest.

OK to push to libreoffice-3-4?

Rene, does this look OK? (Bjoern said an IRC that it looks fine to him,
but let's wait an ACK from you before pushing.)

It looks OK code-wise, but TBH I don't see a sense in this. Distros should fix
their jars, we shouldn't hide problems.
And if the problem is widespread - so be it. One more reason to get distro
maintainers fix it.

What improvement does the check have? You'd still fail here. The same as
before.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.