On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:32:48 +0200
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
I think we both have, albeit for different reasons, agreed that
nobody really wants to use 'unsigned int'. I can give you the numbers
for sal_uInt64 too if you want a "proof" that there's only minor
usage of sal_ types. Grep for '\bint\b' or '\blong\b' if you want to
see that standard types usage is significant.
I still count 16426 \bint\bs (including external and unsigneds) and
55452+16426=71878 \bsal_Int32\b/\bsal_uInt32\bs (cxx only). "Standard
type" usage is still insignificant and changing that is a pointless
uphill battle.
Best Regards,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.