Re: [Libreoffice] Purpose of easy task 'Get rid of sal_uLong' ?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tor Lillqvist <tlillqvist@novell.com> wrote:
[...]
> and what should have been used instead would be some "gint64orlonger" type.
btw that already exist in stdint.h , although not very keystroke friendly:

/ 7.18.1.2 Minimum-width integer types
int_least8_t;
int_least16_t;
int_least32_t;
int_least64_t;
uint_least8_t;
uint_least16_t;
uint_least32_t;
uint_least64_t;

// 7.18.1.3 Fastest minimum-width integer types
int_fast8_t;
int_fast16_t;
int_fast32_t;
int_fast64_t;
uint_fast8_t;
uint_fast16_t;
uint_fast32_t;
uint_fast64_t;