On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 05:41:20PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
2011/3/26 Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org>:
Shouldn't l10ntools/java/jpropex be removed then ?
Or the whole l10ntoos/java directory while we're at it ?
Good question.
java/l10nconv and java/receditor are not even build (they are not in
build.lst) so removing them is not risky.
OK.
As far as I can tell, jpropex has been never used in OpenOffice.org
localization. But it does not mean that it will not be used in the
future. It is quite new code. See #i100854# and #i112394#. We might
need it for the proper localization of Oracle Report Builder
extension.
I thought the plan was to remove as much java dependencies as possible.
Introducing new ones would be a pretty bad move IMHO.
What are these #i100854# and #i112394# references ? I didn't find anything
named like this in bugzilla.
--
Francois Tigeot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.