On Friday 25 of March 2011, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-25 at 13:55 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
It should be the current full list, with duplicates removed (i.e. once
per every source of the problem, not once per every time it's reported).
Why should it be that bad?
argh!, I meant to say "then things are *not* too bad", not "*too* bad".
I mean that's far less that I would have feared, quite manageable.
Ok. In that case, if there are no objections, I'll commit my patches.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.