Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build

Francois Tigeot <ftigeot -AT- wolfpond.org>
Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:51 +0100

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 03:16:35PM +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote:

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 17:10 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:

Yes, it does. One might even consider to put even the X86 and X86_64
specifics in an own file


Yeah, attached is what I propose to push if there's no objections.


Looks good to me.

Howewer, I'd prefer to have only one dragonfly.mk file. No need to have
two files with tens of identical lines and only one or two different ones.

You can just delete the -INTEL file and rename the other one, I'm not
trying to build on i386 for now.

-- 
Francois Tigeot

Context

[Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build · Caolán McNamara
- (message not available)
  - Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build · Caolán McNamara
    - Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build · Bjoern Michaelsen
      - Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build · Caolán McNamara
    - Re: [Libreoffice] linux.mk and ppc, arm, etc and gmake build · Francois Tigeot

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.