Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Michael,

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22:22AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 08:27 +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
It was not luck, there was some conditional code to use either GNU or
straight cp. It may have been a hack though.

      Hey - well, if we can do a build with your 'cp' that works, then we
should tweak the configure check to cope with that. Patches accepted -
and apologies for the regression, some of these things are almost
inevitable sadly.

Sure. Moving to gmake is worth it, tho

There are really two things here:
- gcp could'nt be used with the previous build system if it was in a different
  place than /bin/cp . Even if you specified the full path, some files still
  tried to run /bin/cp with gcp-like arguments.
- it is not possible to run a build with a non-gnu cp anymore (I tried once),
  removing the check in configure.in is not sufficient.

With the new build system, gcp has become usable and we're trading a
regression for a fix; there are more important issues with the new build
system such as undefined variables in some Makefiles and I'd like to fix
these first.

-- 
Francois Tigeot

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.