Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp

Caolán McNamara <caolanm -AT- redhat.com>
Tue, 15 Mar 2011 21:16:48 +0000

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 20:54 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:

On 03/09/2011 06:01 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:

On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:

On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:

On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:

What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?


Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.


Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked
into the 3.3 branch?


This doesn't affect a lot of people in practice, only the Linux
non-x86/x86_64 people IIRC, +1 from me if you want to stick it into 3-3.


Great. Who can do the actual sticking into 3.3 (I can't) ?


This gone done now IIRC, right ?

C.

Context

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jani Monoses
- [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Michael Meeks
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jani Monoses
- Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Caolán McNamara
  - Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jani Monoses
    - [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Michael Meeks
      - Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Caolán McNamara
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jani Monoses
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Caolán McNamara
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jani Monoses
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Caolán McNamara
      - Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Wols Lists
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Michael Meeks
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Kevin Hunter
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Jonathan Aquilina
        Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] remove unused declaration - an unlikely fix for armel segfault in regcomp · Michael Meeks

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.