[Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office)

Thorsten Guenther <thorsten.guenther -AT- aposso.de>
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:48:26 +0100

Am 27.01.2011 11:48, schrieb Michael Meeks:

I wouldn't mind spear heading an effort to do a python port
of LO in regards to going web based. Cant you integrate the
C++ code we have with python?

      If you want to do a python port of some things; I guess working on some
Java -> Python conversion would be great for some of the built-in
extensions etc.


Hi,
could you please give me an idea why it would be useful to replace a
language alien to the core with another alien? I guessed the replacement
of Java is to eliminate integration issues. If that's not the case...
whats the problem with Java? Just the "is a appropriate JRE / JDK
installed" issue?. Sorry, perhaps a noob question.

Thanks, regards
Thorsten Guenther

Context

[Libreoffice] web based libre office · Ged Wed
- Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Michael Meeks
  - Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Ged Wed
    - Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Michael Meeks
      - Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Jonathan Aquilina
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Michael Meeks
        
        [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Thorsten Guenther
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Michael Meeks
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Thorsten Guenther
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Michael Meeks
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Thorsten Guenther
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · BRM
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Thorsten Guenther
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Wols Lists
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Kohei Yoshida
        Re: [Libreoffice] Rationale for replacing Java with anything but c++ (was Re: web based libre office) · Thorsten Guenther
  - Re: [Libreoffice] web based libre office · Samphan Raruenrom

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.