On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:09:33AM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 08:20 +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Great work, but out of curiosity wouldn't it be better to use cmake
instead since we are cross compiling for different platforms?
In short: no :-)
A longer answer would be - that all the sensible alternatives,
including CMake were analysed, and Bjorn chose gmake primarily since it
seems to be the only thing that cuts it for the job. I imagine he wrote
upsome analysis somewhere,
Indeed he did:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_System_Analysis .
There were also lots of emails discussing it at dev@openoffice.org
mailing list (archive at
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/SummarizeList?listName=dev ).
D.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.