Hi All, Some colors of LibO are already part of palette, I just wanted to update it to follow the latest colors in wiki. If not required to provide LibO colors with the product (as a main or separated palette) then I we can leave the current situation or roll back. I would like to provide these colors but this is one opinion :o) Regards, KAMI 2010-12-27 13:19 keltezéssel, Christoph Noack írta:
Hi Kami, my apologies ... having only brief looks at certain topics does not really help :-\ I thought the original color palette won't be affected at the moment, since the branding colors are: * not that long lasting (belonging to the initial branding, but will be replaced with the community branding once we start to develop that with the wider community) * are specific to a small group (the LibO community) Thus, my understanding was to ship the original color palette file like some others - being optional and not affecting the default palette. Our "normal" users don't have that much benefit creating stuff with that few (hand picked) colors. I am wrong (rhetorical question, since your answer already conveys that I am wrong... *g*)? If yes, what is the plan? :-) Cheers, Christoph Am Montag, den 27.12.2010, 09:21 +0100 schrieb Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai:Dear Christoph, I wanted to include the "original" palette, but: * This palette is not complete, I miss some other cool colors * For compatibility reason I would like to keep the legacy palette * For consistency I would include Chart color too If you want I would create patch that contains the LibreOffice colors, then chart colors and finally the legacy color palette. Best regards, KAMI 2010-12-25 15:29 keltezéssel, Christoph Noack írta:Hi Kami, having just 30 seconds left until my family wants to see me again (*g*), I'd like to refer to the color palette we already provide for download (we try to keep this up-to-date as well). Maybe this eases the work on this issue ... does it? http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Resources Kind regards, Christoph PS: I've noticed that anybody updated the name of the list (now: "LibreOffice ML"), but the subject line still states the "wrong" "Libre_o_ffice". Who is the one who should be bothered? Am Samstag, den 25.12.2010, 09:52 +0100 schrieb Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai:Hi All, Palette updates based on http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Colors Also I put <space> beween "Libre" and color name. Please review it and apply if you like it. Best regards, KAMI _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
-- Best regards, Kálmán „KAMI” Szalai | 神 | kami911 [at] gmail [dot] com My favorite projects: OxygenOffice Professional <http://ooop.sf.net/> - office suite - for everybody | Magyarul <http://hun.sf.net/> - In Hungarian Blog <http://bit.ly/10ucTR> | Support <http://bit.ly/eYZO6> Follow me <http://bit.ly/gJuJZ>, if you can <http://bit.ly/kDocB>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature