Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 13:23 -0200, Kayo Hamid wrote:
So, it's a small patch that I send for review because I do not know if 
it's ok to do what the cppcheck says to do. In this case, he says that 
for non-primitive types we can do ++test instead test++. My fear is if 
in the code really need to be test++, understand?

In those use cases it makes no difference whether it's a post- or
pre-increment.  It matters only when its return value is stored & used.

I pushed your patch to master.

Kohei

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.