Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual
editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementation.
Please, do not tell we do not need this feature when you do not know how
to implement your visual editor without destroying it.
As I said position and selection synchronization between the two
editors is possible.
But it's not a priority of mine, fixing current bugs in the visual editor is :)

Note: That the visual editor is still an experimental feature, and not
enabled by default!
If the visual editor causes regressions in a magnitude worth talking
about we can take that discussion when it's declared stable...
 - That is not happening now...
But I will keep in mind that the current user base is not fond of
regressions... :)

By the way, do you totally discard the need for an easy-to-use formula editor ?
I'm not saying that there's no need command text interface... And if
you love the way the formula cursor works now... I don't think it's a
problem to create a settings checkbox where you can determine formula
cursor behavior...
But I'm hoping that at some point during the development the two
things will blend nicely, so that it works out for everybody :)

--
Regards Jonas Finnemann Jensen.



On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:11, Jean-Baptiste Faure <jbf.faure@orange.fr> wrote:
Le 29/12/2010 20:06, Jonas Finnemann Jensen a écrit :
[...]
If you disable experimental features, everything is back to normal.
And position and selection synchronization "can" be fixed before this
feature is enabled by default...
Assuming someone cares to implement it... and you're are welcome to
step up to the plate :)
I strongly disagree : it is you who must not to destroy what is working
very well.
If you need to remove cursor formula feature to implement your visual
editor, that proves there is some defect in your implementation.
Please, do not tell we do not need this feature when you do not know how
to implement your visual editor without destroying it.
I hope we can agree that a visual editor, where the old command text
interface is still available, is a good idea... And a great
improvement to many users... Especially those migrating from Microsoft
Office.
Not sure: you seem to be assuming that users migrating from MS-Office do
that only because LibO is free. It is not what I see around me. Many
users, scientists, students, are leaving MS-Word because it does not
work well enough, especially the MathType module bundled with MSO. They
are ready to use Latex instead of LibO...

Best regards.
JBF

--
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.