On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 23:54 -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote:
I brute-forcedly narrowed it down to the following patch, but I'm REALLY
unsure of it.
Well, firstly that's awesome work, 99% of the battle is generally
finding the code in the first place.
I don't know I should change it to FALSE (as I did in the
patch) or remove the if () block altogether.
On first glance, I'm rather baffled by the whole thing too :-). I'd like
to call in a translation strike on some of the comments around
SetDontExpand and friends. I had rather hoped that a fix would appear
higher up in merely the ui level or thereabouts where there's far less
chance of any knock-on side effects.
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.