On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 11:45 +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
These are all valid solutions, but they will not help for the quality of
the first (3.3) release, which will be rather important. Maybe a
solution for the Microsoft Windows package could be to put in the
"smaller" multi-language installer only explicitly approved
localizations, relegating untested languages into the "all" package; but
I understand this could become a maintenance nightmare later on...
A really interesting idea :-) but I guess, through minor point
releases, we'd want to include more of these, as they came up to
scratch, and if not - it is fairly similar to the "one fixed deadline to
rule them all" idea :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] Release criteria (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.