Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Giole, Peter, *,

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Gioele Barabucci <gioele@svario.it> wrote:

IIRC the idea [1] was to move as much XSLT processing as possible to libxml,
not to Xalan, as libxml is already used internally by LibreOffice.

The "main goal" behind this task is to avoid the need for a
java-runtime fo tasks where it isn't needed, i.e. to replace stuff
that is currently using java with c/c++ code.

Of course it doesn't make sense to just rip it out for the sake of it,
the replacement must support the same features as the java based
implementation.

And as you already noticed it doesn't make sense to require an other
runtime environment such as mono/.net instead.

ciao
Christian

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.