On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 05:51:48PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
The information is there in slightly different form, see the attached
screenshot. The version in libreoffice-build-<versions> has exactly the
same value as the VERSION in the LIBREOFFICE_<VERSION> tag.
[...]
What others think? ;-)
I'm happy wih libreoffice-build a.b.c.d[1], but that will get a problem
in bootstrap builds, no?
Grüße/Regards,
René
[1] I am using
                --with-build-version="libreoffice-build $(OOO_BUILD_VERSION), $(DIST) package 
$(BINARY_VERSION)" \
 anyways, which e.g. expands to "libreoffice-build 3.2.99.3, Debian package 1:3.3.0~beta2-2" for 
beta3
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.