Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Miklos Vajna píše v Pá 03. 12. 2010 v 17:38 +0100:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 11:34:13AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida <kyoshida@novell.com> wrote:
It is enough?

I can deal with it, but making it identical with the git tag would make
it much easier.

BTW, what is the reason the tag is LIBREOFFICE_3_3_0_1 instead of
libreoffice-3.3.0.1? IIRC cvs did not allow dots in tag names, but that
is not the case with git. Or is there any other reason?

Good questuion! We use the cvs naming scheme just from the historical
reasons. I would not mind to use the libreoffice-3.3.0.1 variant.


Best Regards,
Petr


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.