Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 03/12/10 02:26, Kevin Hunter wrote:
I'm absolutely for this, especially in terms of getting any/all
necessaries rewritten in C++ ... but not right now.  As others have
stated, like it not, the current product uses Java (e.g. Base) and I
believe it would be foolhardy to default to a build that is not likely
to be deployed to end-users.  When (if?) the code has been gutted of
Java, it might be time to revisit this motion, but now is not that time.

If the conversion to C++ is an important goal (and long-term, I do
believe it is), I think it would be better put on the wiki as a
not-so-easy/short hack. 

Where do I start :-)

Seeing as Base is where I want to work, this seems an obvious thing to
do. I'm guessing that building without Java, then running some tests
(smoketest? what?) and seeing what breaks is a good idea.

If someone can guide me where to go, I'll try and get started (homelife
permitting :-)

Cheers,
Wol

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.