Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com

Hi Jesse

I was talking about cppcheck bugtracker. There has been a fix for the 
tracker #2235, this one has been corrected yesterday.
About false positives, i've created 3 trackers on cppcheck for the 
moment. 2 have been fixed : #2235 i talked about and #2210 which has 
been corrected by the cppcheck guys the 18/11. It seems like the other 
one (#2217) has been corrected with other fixes since they didn't 
reproduce it.

Julien.

Le 27/11/2010 23:02, someone@boldandbusted.com a écrit :
> Hi Julien,
>
> It is the "git" version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via
> Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks
> know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it
> isn't a false positive ;) ).
>
> Which "tracker" are you referencing? cppcheck's bugtracker or LO's? I'll
> bump cppcheck today.
>
> Cheers,
> Jesse Adelman
> Bold and Busted LLC
> http://www.boldandbusted.com/
>
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:44 +0100, "Julien Nabet"<serval2412@yahoo.fr>
> wrote:
>    
> > Hello,
> >
> > libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version
> > cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ?
> > I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example,
> > lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today
> > it's corrected.
> > It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning
> > of the report.
> >
> > Julien.
> > _______________________________________________
> > LibreOffice mailing list
> > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> >
> >      
>