On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+libreoffice@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi *,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Takeshi Abe <tabe@fixedpoint.jp> wrote:
[cppcheck patches]
I'm curious: Why does cppcheck "complain" about "for.... i++" and
suggests/demands pre-increment instead (for ... ++i)?
Is there any noticable difference?
In my opinion:
If there is a noticeable difference -- in a place where the 2 forms
are indeed interchangeable -- then this is a bug to be filed with the
compiler.
And if they are not interchangeable in the context, then cppcheck
should be silent....
Norbert
ciao
Christian
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.