Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Christian,

On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:09:36 +0100, Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+libreoffice@googlemail.com> wrote:
I'm curious: Why does cppcheck "complain" about "for.... i++" and
suggests/demands pre-increment instead (for ... ++i)?

Is there any noticable difference?
Yes, see:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html#faq-13.14
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html#faq-13.15
IIRC Scott Meyers' "More Effective C++" also elaborates on it.

Corollary: we should prefer ++C to C++ to call the language :)

Cheers,
-- Takeshi Abe

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.