Hi Christian, On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:09:36 +0100, Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+libreoffice@googlemail.com> wrote:
I'm curious: Why does cppcheck "complain" about "for.... i++" and suggests/demands pre-increment instead (for ... ++i)? Is there any noticable difference?
Yes, see: http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html#faq-13.14 http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/operator-overloading.html#faq-13.15 IIRC Scott Meyers' "More Effective C++" also elaborates on it. Corollary: we should prefer ++C to C++ to call the language :) Cheers, -- Takeshi Abe