On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 03:33:08AM -0700, Tor Lillqvist <tlillqvist@novell.com> wrote:
Sure, although I think I would prefer to keep OSL_THIS_FUNC as "" instead of "(unknown)" in the fallback case.
OK, I just changed that and pushed it.
So, you think the i#114290 argument that neither __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ nor __func__ can be used because neither is a string literal and thus can't be compile-time concatenated with other string literals is bogus?
Yes, to my understanding.
As such, it is true of course that they can't be used like that. But is the proper solution then just to not try to use OSL_THIS_FUNC in that way? Instead just pass it as a separate argument to printf (yeah, my C background shows through) or whatever?
I think, so. At least my use-case is like this:
OSL_TRACE("%s: unhandled segment '%x' in the path", OSL_THIS_FUNC, nSeg);
Attachment:
pgpLwUsM2XTXh.pgp
Description: PGP signature