Hi there,
On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 13:53 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
- Module readlicense_oo needs to be modified to not produce them. Patch
is in git (and reverted again).
oh - shame - why reverted ?
- Module scp2 needs to be modified to not copy them. Patch is in git
(and reverted again)
Ditto ;-) you do realise scp2's dependencies are rather sub-par, it is
well worth removing unxlngi6.pro in scp2/ at a whim.
- instsetoo_native then complained about a missing
LICENSE-EN_es.html.orig or something, even after I had done a make
clean. Not sure where that came from. Perhaps a reboot would have
fixed it (our environment variable fudging is amazing).
Reboots ? just start a new clean login shell (in an xterm eg.) would be
just as good; it is ~impossible for one shell to corrupt another's
environment (unless it is its child).
So I had to revert this. If someone tackles it, can we put the README
and LICENSE in the existing directories please? Currently 8 out of 13
topdir entries in our installation refer to some readme or license.
Right - this is really silly. And for the bundled extensions there is
no need to have separate licenses either, nor a separate license per
language IMHO.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] 5 times LGPL installed (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.