Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 04:11 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
nice going, I see little enough risk in this other than introducing a
different error of the same type ;-) ( but it looks good to me ) The key
thing is that the internal number representation is always valid anyway
and this is a presentation bug. I think we are ok to push this to
master.

        Can we get it on the stable branch too; that bug is just way too
embarassing ;-)

        Thanks John!

                Michael

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.