On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 04:11 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
nice going, I see little enough risk in this other than introducing a
different error of the same type ;-) ( but it looks good to me ) The key
thing is that the internal number representation is always valid anyway
and this is a presentation bug. I think we are ok to push this to
master.
Can we get it on the stable branch too; that bug is just way too
embarassing ;-)
Thanks John!
Michael
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.