On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 16:45 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi,
I think about what package names and paths use for the openSUSE
LibreOffice packages. I wonder how they should conflict with the
universal Linux Libre Office build and what they should share with it.
+ /usr/lib(64)/libreoffice - proposed path for distro-specific
build
Yup, works for me.
2. user configuration:
+ ~/.libreoffice/3 - used by the universal linux build
+ ~/.libreoffice/3-<distro> - proposed alternative
distro-specific path, e.g. ~/.libreoffice/3-suse
I tried to use the same directory but the other build did not
start because incompatible berkley DB, see the attached
screenshot
I thought that problem has been sort of fixed at some stage to
ignore/overwrite those databases when they couldn't be opened
(#i107440), *shrug*, if not, then sure, the above works for me. We got
something similar with dual boot guys with different versions of the
same distro, so maybe best to somehow version that name using the
version of db that OOo is built against :-)
3. package names:
The only problem is the same name for the libreoffice-ure package. I suggest to
rename it to libreoffice3-ure in the universal linux build.
Yeah, this has been something a problem in the past. That works for me.
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.