Hi Sidney,
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:41 +1300, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
How is this behaviour different from git pull without the -r ?
Oh - it is basically evil ;-) the -r will rebase you existing commits
onto master - by forcibly moving and re-applying them - and in doing so
re-write history.
Where is the -r option documented for git pull?
Well - the rebasing part is documented here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-rebase.html
I'm no expert, but AFAIR if people generally do rebases for small sets
of changes that are not pushed yet - it makes the history look more
linear, and cleaner / easier to read in eg. gitk.
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.