Present: Eyal, Bogdan, John, Jan, Heiko
Comments: Jouni, Stuart
Tickets/Topics
* Default color-accented notebookbar has to low contrast to
quick access icons
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173755
+ rather change icons than colors (Heiko)
+ disagree with changing colors (John)
+ mostly an issue at the disabled state (Stuart)
+ against making the colors monochrome: Somewhat disrespectful to icon
theme maintainer and makes the icon scheme inconsistent (Eyal)
+ colored icons not matching the background is a generic issue
that could be solved with an aura or shadow (Eyal)
+ it's just a bad "first impression" (Jan)
+ increasing the contrast of the background (blue color) of the
icons sounds good, lighter blue for light theme, darker blue for
dark theme (Bogdan)
+ icon style might be destroyed with aura/shadow etc. (Jan)
=> change icons is the easiest
* Adopt the "ghost-cut" approach to cutting
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173772
+ welcome as alternative (Jan, Heiko)
+ some questions around the usability, but interesting anyway (all)
+ all about the history of cut 'n paste:
https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/ENS/FundHCI/2013/papers/Tesler-CutCopyPaste-Interactions2012.pdf
(Jan)
+ moving text cross-application is not possible/easy anymore (Jan)
=> make it optional, eg. per Tools > Option > (somewhere)
(o) Cut n' paste ( ) Ghost 'n paste
* Enable Different Document Background Color by Program in
Appearance Options
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170776
+ use case plausible but not strong enough (Jouni)
+ users may appreciate the possibility (John)
+ tend to disagree but not sure (Eyal)
+ dark background on/off could be interesting (Eyal)
+ we can store the "use white background" option but that means to
place the option under the module settings away from Appearance;
still against the proposal (Heiko)
+ yet another thing to manage- too much for most users (Jan)
=> detriments outweigh the benefit => WF
* Object resizing - Have Krita behaviour
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165750
+ duplicate of bug 161441 (Jan)
=> DUP
* Preference to always encrypt to additional GPG keys
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162630
+ agree with the request (Eyal)
+ if possible, add the encryption to a template (Heiko)
+ footgunable request, would expect prototype before playing
with security (Jan)
+ current situation is weird with self-encryption plus two more,
against templates as special encryption is easy to forget and
template authors usually do not consider encryption,
requires better visibility of target users aka address book (Eyal)
=> accept and comment
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
- [libreoffice-design] Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2025-Oct-07 · Heiko Tietze
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.