As to the question of what i intented with my references to monopolistic organizations I did think of the loss of odf to docx in the competition for open standard canonization.
In the future I will refarin from bothering you with my suggestions- p Den 01-08-2024 18:45, skrev John Kaufmann:
Paul,I don't /think/ your post relates to either the comment from Csongor or to the LibO Design minutes to which Csongor was responding, so I hope you will forgive this attempt to separate it from the "Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2023-Jul-31", in the interest of both solving your problem and maintaining clarity with respect to the minutes. [If I have misjudged that premise, please correct me.] I would suggest that this might be best addressed to the LibreOffice Users list <users@global.libreoffice.org> (a good list for sharing common problems and solutions), with a Subject line something like: "DOCX files rendered as black text on black background". [However, I have not added that list to this distribution, as it seemed too much presumption on my part; that is your call. I have also not modified the Subject line, though I think it is appropriate to do so.]To be clear: Are you saying that, when you import a DOCX file, the text is rendered as black on a black background? (If so, let's begin by affirming that I never see that, so we can be pretty sure that this is not a LibreOffice design issue.) If that is not the issue, please clarify.Also, does the phrase "monopolistic texts" refer to proprietary (MS or Apple) formats? Again, if not, please clarify.Kind regards, John On 2024-08-01 10:53, paul hofseth wrote:sirs,I occasionally look at your dialogues and at times misguidedly complain about program stability rather than lack of "bells and whistles" .I do realize that your task is dealing with the user interface and not with the data mechanics, but do hope that you have communication lines that concern program usefulness-.This time I am sorely tempted to comment on the disability of reading monopolistic texts in docX format even if it lies outside your remit.When working with our new book i have discovered a msjor annoyance when my co-authors use microsoft or apple. Black text on black background is not enlightening in any sense of the word.p. Den 01-08-2024 16:33, skrev Csongor Halmai:Hi Heiko, you wrote this: + necessary if the app DPI differs from the screen DPI (Csongor) but I didn't say this.I meant in my comment that this feature would be useful when you want to see more information than the resolution of your screen (and your eyes) allows. You could magnify the region of interest (ROI) while you still can see the big picture as well.I created a mimicking screenshot in GIMP how I think it should look: https://i.ibb.co/WW0WsxC/magnifier-sample.pngDisclaimer: for the screenshot, I used the Spherize filter of GIMP, which is geometrically not identical to a magnifier lens but shows well enough what I would like to see.In order to not hide anything from the underlying screen, it is essential that the center of the circle shows things larger than their original size but at the same time, around the edge, things look smaller. This way, the magnifier doesn't cover anything, just shows some distortion around the edges.A realistic lens effect can be seen here: https://youtu.be/XtCW-axRJV8?t=271I think this would be such a useful feature that it should be supported at operating system level.Csongor On 1/08/2024 04:56, Heiko Tietze wrote:Present: Sahil, Eyal, Heiko Comments: Mike, Justin, Stephane, Stuart, Cor Tickets/Topics (Suggested bump-up (Eyal):* Cell selecting fat border looks ugly especially if you selected somecell range, it also can block content in other cells https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161709+ Rafael: Made commits to improve the cosmetic situation, considerthe bug fixed. + Rafael: This was done to resolve 143733, which requested the rectangle not cover the active cell + Heiko: Suggest accepting the current situation for now + Eyal: Serious degradation of UX - text in surrounding cells partially hidden, can make one value appear as another due to hiding.+ Eyal: Suggest back-out of changes to before 143733, for now, andreconsideration. Must fix this for 24.8 release.+ Eyal, Mihai, Rafael, Roman, flm2: Excel active cell rectangle looksnice => please discuss at Bugzilla or the mailinglists (Heiko) )* No option to automatically indent multiline list entries to alignwith numbering followed by space + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156071 + line up *subsequent lines* of each list entry, see c12 + no good example for the necessity (Mike, Cor, Heiko) + mandatory to have this as cross-platform feature (Justin, Cor) + A tab is, in the general sense, an inherently flawed solution,because once your number exceeds the tab width - you'll overflowand the alignment will be messed up (Eyal) + Request is reasonable (Eyal):+ Follows a different aesthetic principle: Fixed amount of space between number and paragraph content v-start rather than uniformcontent v-start across all paragraphs+ Should be implemented via a paragraph feature to move all lines further in to respect the maximum constraints on each individualline (e.g. numbering, wrapping around frames etc.), ensuringthat the paragraph's v-start is uniform across all lines, withouthaving to set it explicitly using indentation and/or tabs.+ Should be usable even without numbering being active (an aspectof a paragraph's style) + requires probably also to start a list from any number (Heiko) + MSO does exactly the same as we do (Heiko) => comment * Tab stop of list contents increases then decreases in default Roman numeral list, looking messy + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162133+ Microsoft Office forces right alignment for Roman numerals, oftenwith horrible results (Justin)+ right-alignment is not the right solution => WF (Stephane, Cor)=> solution follows bug 156071 * PIVOTTABLE: Formating Pivot Tables + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51732 + double-click brings up the Data Field dialog currently, add a context menu (Stephane. Cor) + perhaps more obvious via push button? (Sahil) => provide a context menu for the functions * Magnifier Tool for a quick overview and spot zoom into a document in Multiple-page view + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162101 + magnifier is always just a click away, eg. Win + +/- on KDE + bug it does not render again with a higher resolution (Heiko)+ "magnifier" would be an excellent feature *in general* (Stuart, Cor)+ necessary if the app DPI differs from the screen DPI (Csongor)+ duplicates / relates to bug 101646 "UI option "Scaling" was removed"with a lot duplicates itself + weird relation to multi-page view; suggest to do with low priority (Eyal) => comment
-- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
