Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2023 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Sorry for missing the session today... I'll have to comment offline. It's always difficult to "argue" with the minutes, but I guess there's no getting around it.

So, here is the part of the minutes I am concerned about:

On 12/04/2023 21:44, Heiko Tietze wrote:
  * Rename Presentation Styles to Drawing Style
    + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154492
    + presentation styles are used in the master view primarily (Regina)
      + but changing the background color or the bullets is always
        possible (Heiko)
    + renaming might be an option but it would still be used as a style
      + disagree with renaming (Roman)
    + changing master attributes in the normal edit mode is a desired
      feature; it is understood as a style and changing the name wont
      alter workflow or design
    + the documentation could deserve some improvement, see
      https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/lo/text/simpress/01/05100000.html
    => forward to documentation

Let's start by noting that the bug was not about "Rename Presentation Styles to Drawing Styles": That's not the bug title, and was never suggested (and it can't make sense since we already have this category). The ask, as of the latest comment on the bug, is renaming to "Slide Master Elements".

No participant defended the claim that the "Presentation Styles" are styles of presentations. No participants claimed that "Slide Master Elements" is an incorrect name for the category.

One person opposed the suggested rename - but that was in a comment on the bug, not in the design meeting, and without an argument against the rename, nor an argument for the validity of the existing name, nor a suggestion of an alternative solution to the problem.

As for the documentation:

* It was clarified on the bug page that the bug is not about documentation, so any documentation change does not, and cannot even in principle, resolve the bug. * Saying that the "documentation could deserve some improvement" is a mis-representation. The documentation for this is partially missing and the rest is incorrect and entirely unhelpful (details on the bug page)

More importantly - it is a UX conundrum to have a style category of non-styles. And let's not talk about what happens when you try to add a new "Presentation style"...

Bottom line: IMHO, this bug did not see useful discussion in the meeting (as far as the minutes tell us at least) and no conclusion about it was reached. Suggest bringing it up again next time, and I'll try to attend.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.