On 10/13/18 9:13 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Thanks, I added some comments, suggestions. And text (Ctrl+Shft+E starts
Picking up a comment made by Heiko:
«If the release would be a property of the project we could remove a lot
of needed interactions. Drawback is that only one release is stored.
Does that make sense?»
This raises the idea that perhaps extensions.git.libreoffice.org should
be a thing. A self-hosted git repository.
Bot-driven, it would clone the developer's site, build the extension,
and create the catalogue.
Lot more thinking needs to be done about how to construct it, write the
automation bots, etc.
Still doesn't solve the issue of "not enough volunteers".
Also means yet another piece of software that TDF has to look after.
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.