Hi Stuart,
the keyword needsUXAdvice should be a trigger to comment the hell out of an idea and make things 
shiny. It must not remain there as an alternative to the component (as it was in the past). 
Eventually I'd like to have a handful of tickets with the keyword - and we measure our performance 
on the time an advice is given. But that won't work with >100 tickets.
CC'ing the ML is another question; no special preference from my side (doing the same as you with 
those emails). It has been decided to delete the ML from CC when the keyword is removed. But that's 
optional IMHO.
More opinions are welcome.
Cheers,
Heiko
On 02.11.2017 14:43, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Heiko,
Have noticed you are liberally deleting the UX-Advise ML recipient 
from BZ META issues and some topical issues. Is there a reason?
While these issues may have had their Keyword "needUXEval" removed 
(or not assigned) use of the UX-Advise ML remains an efficient way
to route the BZ comments to the UX and Design team.
Every BZ issue you remove it from deletes that topic from visibility 
by the team.  And folks have to manually add themselves to an issue 
should they desire to follow along--which for most of the META we 
do.
It costs nothing to keep the ML recipient in place (personally with 
mail rule filters I route all the UX-Design related mail out of my 
inbox to a mail folder where they can be reviewed while I am
thinking about LibreOffice).
If with discussion there is some consensus to do this, I'll 
concede--but my personal preference is to leave the ML in place for 
the META and topical issues in BZ. Folks that find the volume too 
high can take the ML as digest or even remove themselves from the 
ML.
Stuart
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-design] Re: Dropping the UX-Advise ML from META and topical BZ issues · Heiko Tietze
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.