Hello world,
Is activating context menu really supposed to be the only way to do those
tasks? It means that the user has to figure out there is SOME context menu
in 1st place and that they can use it.
Double-click starts the default action, which is to open the
modification dialog.
Okay, can anyone knowledgeable please comment on how accessible this context-
menu-only concept really is?
I mean: if *I* as an able-bodied person can't see how to edit/delete/do
further stuff/ with items in the list, how is someone with visual impairment
supposed to [figure out they have to activate context menu]? And if context
menu isn't easily accessible, what would be? Some buttons under the list
widgets?
I really have hard time buying this "$users rarely do $foo, so it's okay to
make accessing $foo totally obscure and hardly usable for everybody" argument
...
--
Katarina Behrens
Softwareentwicklerin LibreOffice
–––
CIB software GmbH
Geschäftsstelle Hamburg
Flachsland 10
22083 Hamburg
–––
T +49 (40) / 28 48 42 -235
F +49 (40) / 28 48 42 -100
Katarina.Behrens@cib.de
www.cib.de
–––
Sitz: München
Registergericht München, HRB 123286
Geschäftsführer: Dipl.-Ing. Ulrich Brandner
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-design] Re: GSoC'17: Customization (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.