* Present: Cor, Heiko, Jay, Kendy, Michel, Samuel, Stuart, Tomaž
* UI changes integrated the last week:
+ Enabled double click in input list field dialog (Oliver)
+ Converted MN_TAB_POPUPMENU to xml (Maxim)
+ Table context menu improvements (Maxim)
+ Clarified advanced options (unstable vs. limited) (Joel)
+ Convert some Calc context menus to xml (Maxim)
+ Filter options dialog controls expandable (Oliver)
+ Convert RID_POPUP_TAB to xml (Maxim)
+ Incremental UI changes only?
+ Joel suggest to not change the whole UI but have small steps
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91820#c25
+ mostly about the menu and toolbar reorg (Kendy)
+ Makes not much sense in this case since there is no half-conceptual menu organization
(Heiko)
+ the hope is that the largest changes are now done (Kendy)
+ and we are back to incremental changes (Kendy)
+ should there be more changes, they'll be incremental again (Kendy)
+ pretty large change overall (Stuart)
+ there was support from the Design team (Stuart)
+ the change was needed, and long overdue (Stuart)
+ yes (Kendy)
+ now back to more easily manageable (Stuart)
+ there was a concept behind the changes (Heiko)
+ we are affecting people's workflows... (Heiko)
+ would be good to have 'something' that introduces the new features (Heiko)
+ when doing changes, we should prefer larger (but complete) change (Tomaž)
+ so that people don't have to re-learn all the time (Kendy)
+ agree (Cor)
+ better bundle the changes (per module) as much as reasonable doable
+ for NotebookBar, we'll need a switch between the old and new (Heiko)
+ that's easy - different concept, so a simple switch is possible (Kendy)
+ Save button behavior (Samuel)
+ Samuel talked to Maxim, Maxim agreed (Samuel)
+ only needs the new icon (Samuel)
+ what to do in 5.1 - revert? (Samuel)
+ let's wait a bit if Maxim can provide the proposed solution ~soon (Kendy)
+ and cherry-pick (Kendy)
+ late feature - will need 3 cross-company approvals (Kendy)
+ if not in time for RC2 (January 11), let's revert in 5.1 (Kendy)
+ Mail merge toolbar (Kendy)
+ implementation ongoing (Kendy)
+ have the basic toolbar now, working on moving the functionality to there from the wizard
(Kendy)
* Area Tab design session (Heiko/Jay)
+ Area Tab - https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94551
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gf7wqYszXnbrbzbyNlLKbJelMb20ssuimxfszcHP_wM/edit?usp=sharing
+ not published yet
* Table styles blog post (Heiko)
+ published, some comments came in (Heiko)
+ nothing controversial, good (Heiko)
+ missing use case for the table style (Michel)
+ scenario / use case - for the persona (Heiko)
+ it is there, but not in a structured / strict way (Heiko)
+ scrum way: have there 'who' and 'why', in one sentence (Heiko)
+ so one can imagine that better
+ fine with that, if it is short (Kendy)
+ want to focus on the resulting work, not paperwork around :-) (Kendy)
* Mockups with Draw? (Michel/Heiko)
+ drafted a blog-post how it could work (Heiko)
+
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MrSd7nwm3PJfKg_DQ79Sbc4jlqWeX280U_yF81pvQiQ/edit?ts=5672a18b
+ and what's missing in Draw (Heiko)
+ should we blog it, or keep internal only so far? (Heiko)
+ reinventing existing stuff a bit (Stuart)
+ if somebody wants to do the work, go for that of course (Stuart)
+ but people are happy with the tools
+ agree with Stuart (Cor)
+ blog post focusing on strengths of Draw would be good (Cor)
+ but not as a tool to create workflows (Cor)
+ some features are missing, some need adjustments (Heiko)
+ and could be useful in Draw (Heiko)
+ but should not be a replacement for people's tools (Heiko)
+ wanted to propose only a small step (Michel)
+ people should be using tools that fit them, no forcing of this or that (Kendy)
+ we can do recommendations, but that's only it :-) (Kendy)
+ important to manage expectations (Cor)
+ shapes tab in the sidebar - that could get us closer (Jay)
+ down to stencils / objects
+
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sv3Q-XdnHElYGXX2m8OLbRAy1zyodcU231Gn2SkVRV0/edit?usp=sharing
+ have a feeling of feature creep (Kendy)
+ let's stay what we are - a general purpose drawing program, not specialized on UI design
(Kendy)
* Draw problems (Stuart)
+ not that good in vector drawing - freehand/Illustrator/Krita (Stuart)
+ problem with beziers (as in hand lettering/cursive lettering)
+ svg's should be handled correctly
+ please file bugs :-) (Kendy)
+ Draw does not have too exactly defined use (Tomaž)
+ "does many things, but some of them not too well" (Stuart)
+ might be interesting to have a survey about what the users actually use Draw for (Tomaž)
* Bug discussions
+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&component=ux-advise&list_id=527515&query_format=advanced&resolution=---
+ discussed, and acted on:
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
+ Windows high contrast - http://www.picpaste.com/high_contrast-Q8rI1tg0.PNG (sidebar
icons missing)
+ different bug, please file a separate bugreport (Kendy)
+ https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86341
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-design] Minutes of the Design Hangout: 2015-12-18 · Jan Holesovsky
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.