Hi Kendy, all,
Le 17/12/2014 12:47, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :
Sophie píše v Út 16. 12. 2014 v 19:16 +0100:
Discussing with QA team today, there has been a lot of bug reports
concerning minor enhancements these last days.
It would be better is those enhancements would be first discussed by the
UX team before going to QA for triage because most of the time they
don't have the requested info regarding bug filling then QA team has to
spend a lot of time to reproduce them and this is not up to the QA team
to discuss UX enhancements.
Please can you send few examples to have a better idea? :-)
or see this list:
Ah! - so Jay is a very active member of the Design Team, and discusses
his proposals the right way; so I am not really concerned about these
reports :-) - they will be handled properly, I am sure.
ok, no problem, Jay is an example (and great to see him so active here
now :) but that will help to set the good process between the teams.
So to get them out of the stats - does the NEEDINFO + ux-advise
component (as Stuart proposed) work for you, Sophie? Jay - can you
please mark your reports that way if yes?
Well, I'm only the messenger here. So let me make the proposal to the QA
team during their meeting this evening, and I'll report back to you, but
I guess they will be ok with Stuart proposal and yours.
Yes, but that is a lot of work for bug triagers. If you well know the
functionality, it's easy to discriminate, but for QA people who do not
have that knowledge, the lack of steps to reproduce, examples, etc. is
very time consuming plus the fact that he won't know what to do with it
(50% of users would like to have it and the other 50% won't), when it
can be solved quickly by discussing a little bit.
Sure, as I did not have the examples, I did not know exactly what you
had in mind :-)
Ok, thanks a lot to Stuart and you to help me clarify it :)