Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Mirek,

I and Jay agreed that the icons look much clearer without the candy-ish fill, especially the "T" and the omega. Currently, the icons bold, italic and underlined in master use the Gnome 2.20 style, with a rather flat gradient and highlights. Here's a SVG comparing the different versions: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12598822/bold%20icon.svg

I didn't attend the last two hangouts, so we didn't make a decision regarding the text icon style, but I could attend next week.

Regarding the icon size, is it really that bad if a few icons make use of the 1 px margin? E.g. the text lines in the bullets and numbering icons look too slim if one leaves the margin untouched.

Since we want to get rid of tango-testing and remove it after rescuing all icons good enough for tango, I don't think it's a good idea to add another theme. Many Gnome apps now use the -symbolic set, so the inconsistency won't be that apparent.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.