Hi all,
At the QA meeting today we discussed the importance of consistency in
the tags that we use in the Whiteboard on our bug reports. We decided
that to make things simple for both old and new contributors, it would
be best for QA to use 'wimpyCaps' for all of our tags.
Examples:
bibisectRequest
confirmed:4.1.3.2:ubuntu
needAdvice
perf
possibleRegression
I know that the Design Team, and Dev Team (and perhaps some other)
have created specific tags for the whiteboard. If possible, we'd like
to standardize the format of all of these to use wimpyCaps.
We'd also like to be consistent when using tags referring to
particular file formats, replacing tags such as 'rtf_filter', 'odf',
and 'ooxml' with 'filter:xxx':
Examples:
filter:ooxml
filter:odf
filter:docx
filter:rtf
Thoughts?
Thanks,
--R
--
Robinson Tryon
LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald
Senior QA Bug Wrangler
The Document Foundation
qubit@libreoffice.org
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-design] Bugzilla Whiteboard: Let's use wimpyCaps consistently · Robinson Tryon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.