I think if enough people are paticipating in the vote for the new
proposal, be it by up- or down-voting, it shouldn't really be any
problem, or?
Just my opinion,
Paul
On 29/01/13 22:42, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Hi Mirek,
On 29/01/2013 22:25, Mirek M. wrote:
Hi everyone,
Maxim created another proposal based on the feedback on his first:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards/4.0_Branding#Proposal_by_Maxim_Dar.C3.A1k
.
I'm adding it to the poll, so please, if you've voted, vote on this
proposal as well.
Hum, changing the proposal when the voting has already begun is not the
the best... Should I really ask members to make a full vote again
including this proposal or do we handle it differently?
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.