Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Patrick,

thanks for caring about LO and for bringing yourself in. This is much welcome!

Concerning your suggestion I am sorry, but I have to be more direct: IMHO it 
makes no sense in the context of LO:

- Most undo-actions in LO will affect only very few last actions, while the 
concept makes undo of numerous actions easy.
- The concept makes it even harder to precisely undo only the last action than 
it is at the moment.
 - The design will spoil the current interface concept of LO (and actually a 
complete redesign of it is simply not on the agenda right now)

There might be applications the idea works with, but i cannot see it embedded 
in LO right now.

But as always: I am more than happy to be proven wrong. ;)

Hope you will continue to join the team - even though the initial reaction 
might not be as positive as you might have hoped! We really appreciate your 
input!

Cheers,
Björn



Am Montag, 2. Juli 2012, 13:10:09 schrieb Sveinn í Felli:
I'm really hesitating towards this. Most applications I know
of, which offer stepping directly into a level in an command
sequence (undo history), those mostly do it via a drop-down
menu. Sometimes this drop-down menu is called by click-hold
action similar to the back-button action in many browsers.
IMHO that would be the way to go.

Best regards,

Sveinn í Felli

Þann mán  2.júl 2012 00:56, skrifaði Kévin PEIGNOT:
Hi !

I love the idea ! Then I think we still need a way to go back easily, just
for "one action", like if we made just a Ctrl+Z. Maybe this can be done by
resistancy in the slider or buttons on the extremity (undo button on the
left, redo button on the right).

For me (correct me if I'm wrong) :
- This is just for the toolbar (almost impossible to implement in the menu
- This might take a lot of horizontal space, How could we minimize this
effect ?

Kévin

2012/7/1 pakohan <patrick.kohan@googlemail.com>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOaTkxGWpyA

Here is a video which should demonstrate what I mean.

--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-for-an-new-Undo-Redo-Function-t
p3993164p3993170.html Sent from the Design mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
-- 
www.OpenUsability.org
www.OpenSource-Usability-Labs.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.