Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

though well-intentioned, I actually forgot to add the design and
ux-advise lists to CC. Doing that now... Astron.

On 2 February 2012 19:22, Stefan Knorr (Astron)
<> wrote:
Hi Barış, Noel,

First of all: Barış, wonderful that you took this up!
Secondly: I am adding the design and UX-advise lists to CC, to see if
we can get any help (artwork etc.) from there.

So, here's an evaluation of your proposal:
* the two most important pieces of information are the version and the
product description, so these should be better highlighted
** for now, it would help the most, if the (c) information were on a
new paragraph instead of directly after the product description
** ideally, the version number should have a slightly larger font
** the (c) notices could be in grey, as in Andrew's proposal, however,
most importantly they need to be shorter.

So, here's a text proposal:
"Version 3.x

LibreOffice is a free and open-source office suite developed by the
LibreOffice community together with The Document Foundation.
[LibreOffice website] [Credits] [License]

LibreOffice is (c) 2000, 2012, the LibreOffice contributors and/or
their affiliates. All rights reserved.
Portions are (c) 2000, 2011 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

Build ID: xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx

Note, IANAL and maybe we need some legal advice before we can shorten
the (c) text this much. The part that we recognise all community
members, I think, does not have to be pronounced so much, I think
TDF's actions speak louder than words here.

Also, everything below the linkscould be greyed out. Further, centered
text looks pretty ugly, I think... I would like to cast a vote
pro-left aligned text.

2012/2/1 Barış Akkurt <>:
-Changed the width of the about dialog to look better.

Actually, I like(d) that, and wider artwork shouldn't be the problem
... does anyone want to do any new artwork, preferably with the motif
in it?

-added the definition of LibreOffice. "LibreOffice is a free and open source
office suite developed by The Document Foundation."

Good idea.

-Added the Document Foundation and Features links.

Hm, I think it would be better to have the link to (new) features
description in the Help, of course, someone would need to look through
the release notes and then build a "What's New" type of document.
Additionally, people will probably be more interested in LibO than in
TDF, so that should be the homepage link instead (I think). Does that
make sense?

-Removed the OK button, just like Firefox.

I think that's a really bad idea, as some weird-or-not window manager
might not give us a titlebar "X" (Gnome 3, *cough*) or a titlebar at
all and then people don't know how to get rid of the window. So, I'd
love to see a reincarnation of the "Close" button (I know, the caption
used to be "OK," but I think "Close" is a better fit as the About
dialogue doesn't actually change any values).

I want to remove the build information and place only the major version info
(like 3.5) but i wasn't sure. Maybe, it is a neccessary information.

Yes, we might want to keep that for now, even though auto-generating
an ODT in the spirit of Mozilla's about:buildconfig might be a good
idea for the future. Anyway, my proposal moves that to the bottom.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.