Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Bernhard,

Very reasonable sounding.  Your comparison was extremely helpful in
visualization.  I agree that 12pt doesn't work really and that 15 dots
aligned can be used sparingly.

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Bernhard Dippold <> wrote:

I tried both positionings in three sizes (equivalent to 12px, 15px and
18px), so I'd like to ask you, where we should define the minimal logo size
(and update the wiki page accordingly).

These two pages at a minimum should contain instructions for use of the

I am not sure that any other pages would be necessary.  (All pages the
discuss logo usage link back to Marketing/Branding).
If you work on your own artwork containing our logo, it should not be
smaller than 98x30 px (nearly about 18pt).

For use-cases where extra small logos are requested, we recommend to use
the pixel adjusted version of an 82x25px logo (about 15 pt).

Does this sound reasonable?



Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.