Re: [libreoffice-design] The interim website

Hi!

One thing what I don't like about libreoffice test page is that if I click
to preview pictures it is sending me to download page. I think the better
solution will be when it is sending to screenshot page or the same but
larger preview screenshot.

Happy Holidays!!
Hillar


2010/12/22 Nik <nik@tdf.nikashsingh.com>

> Hi Bernhard, Christoph, all,
>
> I know this isn't something on our current to-do list or a priority, but
> I've been watching the talk about the soon-to-be-launched Lib/O site;
> http://test.libreoffice.org/
>
> I know this is a work-in-progress and I see the hard work that was put into
> its realisation. So I don't mean to undermine any efforts so far.
> But if the site is going to be live, I'd like to help address the overall
> appearance so it doesn't look so "raw". I've uploaded a couple of quick
> mock-ups here;
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:Nik#Interim_Website_Design_proposals
>
> They show a potential arrangement for the Homepage and an example of a
> two-tiered navigation.
> (Past usability concerns about this type of horizontal menu bar can be
> addressed using some intelligent JavaScript).
> If I've jumped the gun, or contributed unnecessarily on a topic that has
> already been finalised, my apologies and no harm done.
> I just want to help ensure Lib/O puts its best foot forward.
>
> On a less helpful note, I wrote this Email (below) some time ago in
> response to the icons. For some reason it wasn't received by the list.
> I've included it below because I still feel that the concern I raised
> should be aired while discussion on the branding is still relevant.
> I hope you find time to read it even though it is somewhat long, but I'll
> understand if you don't get a chance (it *IS* Christmas after all).
>
> Happy Holidays everyone!
> -Nik
>
> PS. I know this is probably more relevant to the Website list but I didn't
> want to cross-post and I thought it warranted discussion on the Design list
> first.
> In case I've made a mistake.
>
>
> UNRECEIVED EMAIL;----------------------------------------
>
> Hi Bernhard, Christoph, all,
>
> Christoph Noack wrote:
> > Okay, but - at the moment - you might be more interested in the page
> > I've already mentioned:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:ChristophNoack/Initial_MIME_Icons
>
> Can a be a real wet sock and just bring up a concern quickly before
> everything is set in concrete regarding the file icons?
> I noticed that the icons carry on from the current logo design. While the
> logo design concept of the dog-eared document is iconic and intuitive, I
> think the implementation of the logo needs some work before it looks like a
> professional brand. But that may just be my opinion.
>
> What is more relevant right now is the derived styling of the mime-type
> icons and the "reflective surface" in particular.
> I'll be bold and get straight to the point: I think there is no need for
> those icons to be reflective or "shiny".
>
> The Document Foundation (TDF) and LibreOffice have a real opportunity to
> build a very strong brand from scratch. One that isn't driven by
> Internet-popularised trends like Web2.0 reflections. That's an opportunity
> to carve a distinct identity free from design fads and trends. The
> "reflection" will lose favour in time and stop being "new" soon. TDF should
> create a look that is unique and specific to it's character and purpose.
>
> Paper is the heart of the Design concept of TDF right now if I'm not
> mistaken. I've never seen a piece of paper reflect light like a metallic
> object.
> Let's stick to the properties of common paper for our Design inspiration
> and we'll be more consistent for having done so;
> Flat, smooth, porous and fibrous = Honest, simple, warm and natural.
>
> This is just a request. But I hope you'll consider it an important one for
> getting our brand right?
> I know I'm raising concerns without offering solutions and I know it may
> not be practical to do so at this time.
> I'm sure I'm being idealistic while you're all being pragmatic, but I just
> thought it was worth asking in case it was an oversight.
>
> -Nik
>
> PS. I'm guilty of using more than my fair share of the shine/reflection,
> but the first time I heard the name "The Document Foundation" I just knew
> this wouldn't be the place for that kind of Design. It just doesn't suit the
> cause. I hope I'm being more constructive and less obstructive. For what
> it's worth, I like the icons, I just don't think they're entirely
> appropriate?
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org<design%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
> List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/design/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***