Dear Evangelos,
thanks for the clarifications. I'll respond to them below.
On 2026-07-23 12:54, Vaggelhs Va wrote:
**1. Toolbar Customization vs. Docking (Clarification)**
My concern is not about whether a toolbar is floating or docked, but
rather about the /process of customizing/it. Currently, to add or remove
a button, a user must navigate the complex "Tools -> Customization"
menu. This window requires high visual acuity and precise mouse control.
For a user with limb spasticity or low vision, handling this dialog is a
major barrier.
The dialog (and the LibreOffice UI in general) should be usable
completely without the mouse, just using the keyboard.
That seems to be the case in a quick test of mine, but please create a
bug report in Bugzilla if that's not actually true.
Even if it is possible to use the dialog without the mouse, that of
course doesn't mean that it can't be further improved. If you have
concrete suggestions, I'd suggest to create corresponding tickets in
Bugzilla, to make sure they don't get lost, but can be taken into
account for the usual process.
(In particular since various of your suggestions are related to
improving the user experience, the UI/UX team should be involved. If you
want, you can directly set the "needsUXEval" keyword and add
"libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org" in the "CC" field, but
somebody else triaging issues will take care of that otherwise along the
process.)
I am suggesting a permanent, easily accessible, and high-visibility
shortcut (such as a large right-click context menu or a prominent drop-
down arrow) /directly on the docked toolbar itself/, which allows
adding/removing buttons without triggering overwhelming configuration
windows.
That sounds like a good candidate for an enhancement request in Bugzilla.
**2. Application-Specific Scaling vs. OS Scaling (Clarification)**
While OS-level scaling works globally, it often breaks other legacy
applications or creates visual chaos across the OS. The open-source
philosophy supports application autonomy. A major suite like LibreOffice
should have a robust, internal, and independent percentage-based UI
scaling factor that does not rely on Windows, ensuring a stable
environment regardless of OS settings.
As mentioned in my earlier email, we might get this "for free" (by
allowing the user to set an environment variable) in case we end up
switching to the Qt UI toolkit on Windows.
**3. New Technical UX Issues & The Need for Safe Defaults:**
During my daily use of LibreOffice Writer, I have identified four
additional issues where the lack of accessible default settings forces
the user to constantly act as a technical troubleshooter.
/To be clear, these features do not need to be removed from the software
entirely; they just need to be /**disabled by default**/, allowing users
who actually want them to enable them manually:/
*
**Settings Reset After Updates:**After software updates, LibreOffice
frequently resets user configurations. For example, the prompt
warning users about saving in Microsoft Word (.docx) formats instead
of ODF reappears, and native Windows save dialogs switch back to
LibreOffice dialogs (which sometimes appear completely blank/empty).
Updates should strictly preserve all accessibility and environmental
settings under any circumstances.
That sounds like a bug, not the intended behavior. If you know exact
steps to reproduce, please create a ticket in Bugzilla.
*
**Auto-Save & Duplicate File Confusion:**The default background save
function (every 10 seconds) often creates temporary or duplicate-
looking files on the screen. For a low-vision user, this causes
immediate visual disorientation. This feature should be turned off
by default.
*
**Smart Default File Naming (Live Example):**When saving a document,
LibreOffice does not automatically suggest the first line of text as
the filename. Forcing a disabled user to manually type out a
filename every time is an unnecessary physical strain. /Just now,
during my dictation session, I attempted a manual "Save As" and
LibreOffice automatically suggested the generic number "1" as the
filename instead of pulling text from the document./Suggesting the
first line as a default filename should be a built-in accessibility
feature.
For those, too, I think it would be best to create tickets in Bugzilla
for further discussion.
Best regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: accessibility+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.