Rainer Bielefeld píše v Pá 31. 08. 2012 v 06:36 +0200:
the advantage of an "Accessibility" Component would be that it can
easily be selected from a pulldown, no typos or other mistakes can
happen.But a problem is that an "Accessibility" Component would not
indicate what developer might be the one who can fix the problem. So it
always would be replaced during the bug triaging and fixing process.
Well, I think think that most bugs will be about that accessibility does
not work at all or that it does not work for some particular UI
elements. I think that most bugs will affect all LO applications and
will be in the shared code => the component would be fine after all.
I would imagine that we get an expert interested for these bugs.
So I currently think about a Bug Submission Assistant enhancement. We
can add a checkbox "Accessibility affected", and the Assistant will add
"Accessibility"
Interesting idea; Well, it does not solve the problem when people report
bugs directly into bugzilla.
a) as additional pseudo key word to the Bug Summary line. The advantage
of this solution is that the key word would be very visible.
or
b) as additional pseudo key word to the whiteboard
or will
c) set Key word "Accessibility" to the Keyword pane (it should not be a
problem to get this new key word from FDO). The advantae of this
solution is that it also eases and unifies handling in Bugzilla itself,
not only via BSA.
And of course
d) New Component "Accessibility"
still can be discussed.
My order of preference (descending):
c - a - b - d
Your opinion?
After all, my preference is: d a b c
d - is easiest for implementing and also for using by disabled users;
it would work well
a - is natural; people would mention this word anyway in the summary
b - we use whiteboard in many other situations already
c - keywords are not much used these days => non-standard solution
Best Regards,
Petr
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to accessibility+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/accessibility/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.